Skip to content

synthesis.md

Latest commit

 

History

History
240 lines (183 loc) · 8.13 KB

synthesis.md

File metadata and controls

240 lines (183 loc) · 8.13 KB
Raw

Persona Synthesis — Combining Frameworks

How to merge archetype systems into actionable personas without framework soup.

Synthesis Workflow

1. RESEARCH    → interviews, analytics, sales notes, reviews
2. HYPOTHESIZE → pick 2-3 frameworks that explain observed behavior
3. DRAFT       → persona card (see SKILL.md template)
4. STRESS TEST → does it predict channel, objections, tone?
5. PRIORITIZE  → primary (70% focus) + secondary (20%) + anti (10%)
6. DERIVE      → messaging matrix, UX implications, motion direction
7. VALIDATE    → test copy/creative with real segment members

Framework Combination Recipes

Recipe: B2B SaaS Primary Buyer

Layer Framework Why
Traits Big Five + DISC communication in sales cycle
Motivation Enneagram or McClelland what drives the purchase
Context Buying Committee role content format
Behavior Technographics where to reach them

Recipe: D2C Lifestyle Brand

Layer Framework Why
Identity Jung + VALS brand story + lifestyle
Motivation Schwartz values cause and tone
Behavior Shopping archetype funnel design
Context Generational (light) channel selection

Recipe: Developer Tool

Layer Framework Why
Traits Big Five (O↑, C↑, E↓) doc-heavy, skeptical
Motivation Enneagram 5 competence, understanding
Identity Jung Sage truth, depth
Context RIASEC (I/R) content topics
Behavior Spectator/Critic HN, docs, not TikTok

Recipe: Luxury Service

Layer Framework Why
Identity Jung Ruler + Lover status + experience
Segment VALS Achiever/Experiencer resources + motivation
Shopping Experience Seeker pays for moments
Motion SkyElite / Velorah site archetype match

Multi-Persona Map Template

# Audience Map — [Product/Brand]

## Primary (60–70% revenue/fit)
**Name:** [Archetype Name]
**Framework stack:** [list]
**One line:** [essence]
**Key message:** [single sentence value prop]

## Secondary (20–30%)
**Name:** [Archetype Name]
**Framework stack:** [list]
**One line:** [essence]
**Key message:** [single sentence]

## Anti-Persona (explicitly NOT for)
**Name:** [Who we don't serve]
**Why:** [misaligned expectations, support burden, wrong JTBD]
**What we say no to:** [feature requests, deals to decline]

Segment Matrix (2×2 Examples)

Openness × Resources (VALS-adjacent)

                    High Resources
        ┌──────────────┬──────────────┐
        │  Innovator   │  Achiever    │
 High O │  Explorer    │  Experiencer  │
        ├──────────────┼──────────────┤
        │  Maker       │  Believer    │
 Low O  │  (practical) │  (traditional)│
        └──────────────┴──────────────┘
                    Low Resources

Risk × Research Depth

                    Deep Research
        ┌──────────────┬──────────────┐
        │  Analyst     │  Researcher  │
 Low    │  (enterprise)│  (comparison)│
 Risk   ├──────────────┼──────────────┤
        │  Satisficer  │  Impulse     │
 High   │  (trusted    │  (emotional  │
 Risk   │   default)   │   trigger)   │
        └──────────────┴──────────────┘
                    Quick Decision

Messaging Matrix

Persona Headline angle Proof type CTA Tone
Sage / Type 5 "Understand how it works" whitepaper, architecture "Read docs" precise
Hero / Type 3 "Win faster" metrics, logos "Start winning" bold
Caregiver / Type 2 "Support your team" testimonials "Help your team" warm
Rebel / Experiencer "Break the rules" disruptive case study "Join the movement" raw
Ruler / Achiever "Command your market" executive brief "Schedule briefing" authoritative

Persona Audit Checklist

Use when reviewing existing personas or creative:

Persona Quality Audit:
- [ ] Named archetype (memorable, not "Persona 2")
- [ ] Core tension stated (want vs fear)
- [ ] Max 3 frameworks, each adds unique insight
- [ ] Behavioral evidence cited (not invented)
- [ ] Anti-patterns listed (what repels them)
- [ ] Channel + format specified
- [ ] UX/motion implications derived
- [ ] Objections + responses mapped
- [ ] Quote sounds like a real human
- [ ] Primary vs secondary prioritized
- [ ] Anti-persona defined
- [ ] Not demographic-only

Discovery Interview Questions

Traits & style

  • "Walk me through how you decided on your last [category] purchase."
  • "Do you prefer to research alone or ask others first?"
  • "What would make you trust a brand you'd never heard of?"

Motivation

  • "What would success look like in 6 months?"
  • "What's the worst outcome if you choose wrong?"
  • "Who else needs to agree with this decision?"

Behavior

  • "Where did you first hear about solutions like this?"
  • "Do you post reviews, or only read them?"
  • "How long from first visit to purchase typically?"

Framework mapping (internal — don't ask directly)

  • Listen for Enneagram fears in "worst outcome" answers
  • Listen for Big Five in research vs impulse patterns
  • Listen for VALS in status vs practicality language
  • Listen for Technographics in create vs lurk behavior

Persona → Motion Site Mapping

Connect to motion-web-design/presets.md and modules/:

Audience signals Preset base Module notes
Sage, high C, low E VEX, SynapseX motion.subtle; video raw or gradient
Lover, Experiencer, high O Velorah, Organic Odyssey typography cinematic-serif
Ruler, Achiever, premium SkyElite, VANGUARD colors light-premium or bold-agency
Creator, high O, editorial Prisma sections full-editorial
Explorer, experiential Organic Odyssey, Lithos interactions cursor-spotlight

Common Synthesis Mistakes

Mistake Fix
"Our user is everyone" Force primary/secondary split
MBTI + Enneagram + DISC + VALS on one card Pick 2-3 max
Persona is the founder Interview actual users
Demographics only Add motivation + behavior
Static persona, never updated Revisit quarterly with data
Creative ignores persona Put persona card in brief
One site for incompatible personas Split pages or prioritize

Quick Persona from Minimal Input

When user gives only a product category, infer starting hypothesis:

Category Default hypothesis stack Validate with
Dev tools Type 5, Sage, I-RIASEC, Spectator HN, GitHub stars
Luxury consumer Achiever, Ruler, Experience Seeker Instagram, concierge
Wellness Believer/Maker, Caregiver, LOHAS community, reviews
Agency portfolio Creator, Type 4, Experiencer Behance, case studies
Fintech Thinker, high C, Guardian privacy trust badges, compliance
EdTech Social RIASEC, varied generations completion data

Label as hypothesis until validated.

Output Formats

One-liner (for briefs)

[Name] — [Jung archetype] [VALS segment] who [core JTBD] and fears [core fear].

Slide (for stakeholders)

  • Photo placeholder
  • Name + role
  • 3 bullets: goals, frustrations, behaviors
  • 1 quote
  • Framework tags (small)

Full card

Use template in SKILL.md

Segment map

Use multi-persona template above