This visual is meant to answer one practical question:
Where does Oasis Engineering fit between BOXABL, the homeowner, the builder, the AHJ, and the final foundation package?
flowchart TD
A["Owner discovers BOXABL<br/>and wants to place a unit"] --> B["Confirm BOXABL model,<br/>revision, and current docs"]
B --> C["Check site reality<br/>location, slope, access, utilities"]
C --> D{"Is the site simple<br/>and well understood?"}
D -->|No| E["Need site screening,<br/>constraints review, and strategy"]
D -->|Yes| F["Compare likely foundation paths<br/>slab, stem wall, pier-beam, grade beam"]
E --> O1["Contact Oasis early<br/>feasibility and foundation strategy"]
F --> G{"Are soils, drainage, flood,<br/>or permit conditions still unknown?"}
G -->|Yes| O1
G -->|No| H["Coordinate utility entry,<br/>elevations, and support concept"]
O1 --> O2["Oasis defines the project path<br/>and identifies missing inputs"]
O2 --> I["Geotech / local code / AHJ inputs<br/>are gathered as needed"]
I --> J["Foundation family is narrowed<br/>to the correct site-specific approach"]
H --> J
J --> K{"Need sealed drawings,<br/>permit package, or exact details?"}
K -->|Yes| O3["Contact Oasis for PE-reviewed<br/>foundation package support"]
K -->|No| O4["Use public guidance only<br/>for education and planning"]
O3 --> L["Permit-ready coordination<br/>plans, notes, interfaces, sequencing"]
L --> M["AHJ review / permit comments<br/>and builder coordination"]
M --> O5["Oasis stays involved where needed<br/>clarifications, revisions, support"]
O5 --> N["Construction, inspection,<br/>and final installation alignment"]
O4 --> X["Do not build from summaries alone"]
X --> O3
subgraph Manufacturer["BOXABL"]
B
end
subgraph Site["Project Reality"]
C
D
F
G
H
I
J
K
end
subgraph Oasis["Where Oasis Engineering Enters"]
O1
O2
O3
O5
end
subgraph Delivery["Permit to Build"]
L
M
N
end
classDef owner fill:#fff7e6,stroke:#d97706,color:#5b3710,stroke-width:2px;
classDef manufacturer fill:#e8f1fb,stroke:#1d4ed8,color:#102a43,stroke-width:2px;
classDef site fill:#eef7ef,stroke:#2f855a,color:#173b2b,stroke-width:2px;
classDef oasis fill:#fff1f2,stroke:#be123c,color:#5a1022,stroke-width:3px;
classDef delivery fill:#f4f0ff,stroke:#6d28d9,color:#33186b,stroke-width:2px;
classDef warning fill:#fff4f4,stroke:#b91c1c,color:#611a15,stroke-width:2px,stroke-dasharray: 5 3;
class A owner;
class B manufacturer;
class C,D,F,G,H,I,J,K site;
class O1,O2,O3,O5 oasis;
class L,M,N delivery;
class X warning;
BOXABL helps establish the unit, the current model, and the manufacturer document basis.
As soon as the conversation shifts to soils, slope, drainage, utility entry, permit expectations, or interface details, the project becomes site-specific.
The best time to bring in Oasis is usually when:
- the site is not obviously simple
- the owner is comparing foundation families
- the utility and elevation strategy is still fuzzy
- the AHJ or permit path is unclear
- a PE-reviewed package will clearly be required
This repository can educate, orient, and qualify.
It should not be mistaken for a permit-ready foundation package.
If you are still asking:
- "What kind of foundation should I use?"
- "Will my site work?"
- "Will the city accept this?"
- "Do I need a geotech or PE?"
- "How do I coordinate utilities and elevation with the unit?"
that is usually the point where Oasis Engineering becomes part of the service.