Skip to content

JLine3 Telnet server: Unauthenticated Remote DoS via Unbounded Telnet NAWS Terminal Geometry

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jun 17, 2026 in jline/jline3 • Updated Jul 20, 2026

Package

maven org.jline:jline-remote-telnet (Maven)

Affected versions

< 4.2.1

Patched versions

4.2.1

Description

Summary

The JLine3 Telnet server (remote-telnet module) does not apply an upper bound to
terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS (Negotiate About Window Size) option.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a NAWS subnegotiation advertising a
65535×65535 terminal and repeatedly alternate values to trigger continuous, expensive
rendering work on the server, causing CPU exhaustion and denial of service.

Details

TelnetIO.handleNAWS() (TelnetIO.java:856-879) reads the client-supplied width and
height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes them to setTerminalGeometry():

// TelnetIO.java:869-875
private void setTerminalGeometry(int columns, int rows) {
    if (columns < SMALLEST_BELIEVABLE_WIDTH) columns = DEFAULT_WIDTH;  // lower bound only
    if (rows    < SMALLEST_BELIEVABLE_HEIGHT) rows    = DEFAULT_HEIGHT;
    connectionData.setTerminalGeometry(columns, rows);
    connection.processConnectionEvent(
        new ConnectionEvent(connection, ConnectionEvent.Type.CONNECTION_TERMINAL_GEOMETRY_CHANGED));
}

Only a lower bound is enforced (minimum 20 columns / 6 rows). Values up to 65535 are
accepted and stored. The geometry change event propagates to Telnet.java:153-158 where
it calls:

terminal.setSize(new Size(65535, 65535));
terminal.raise(Signal.WINCH);

The WINCH signal triggers LineReaderImpl.handleSignal()redisplay(). Inside
redisplay(), multiple paths iterate up to size.getColumns() times:

  • freshLine() (LineReaderImpl.java:937,953): loops size.getColumns()-1 = 65534
    iterations
    , building and writing a space-padding string across the network socket.
  • columnSplitLength(terminal, size.getColumns(), ...): called multiple times,
    each processing all characters against the 65535-wide line width.

Because WINCH only fires on change, the attacker alternates between two large values
(e.g., 65535 and 65534) to trigger an unlimited stream of expensive render cycles.
No authentication is required; the NAWS option is negotiated before any login sequence.

Affected source files:

  • remote-telnet/src/main/java/org/jline/builtins/telnet/TelnetIO.java lines 856-879
  • remote-telnet/src/main/java/org/jline/builtins/telnet/Telnet.java lines 140-175
  • reader/src/main/java/org/jline/reader/impl/LineReaderImpl.java lines 929-962, 1293-1313

PoC

Send the following two raw Telnet packets in a loop to a running JLine Telnet server.
No login or authentication is required.

Packet 1 — NAWS 65535 × 65535:
FF FA 1F FF FF FF FF FF F0
(IAC SB NAWS 0xFF 0xFF 0xFF 0xFF IAC SE)

Packet 2 — NAWS 65534 × 65534:
FF FA 1F FF FE FF FE FF F0
(IAC SB NAWS 0xFF 0xFE 0xFF 0xFE IAC SE)

Sending these alternately at ~10 packets/second is sufficient to peg one CPU core on
the server. The server remains in this state for as long as the connection is open.

Reproduction environment:

  • JLine3 built from current master on x86_64 Linux, OpenJDK 25.0.2
  • remote-telnet module started with its default Telnet server configuration
  • Test confirmed by source-code analysis and tracing the call chain at runtime

Impact

Type: Denial of Service (CPU exhaustion)
Who is affected: Any application that embeds the JLine3 remote-telnet module and
exposes its Telnet server on a network interface. The attacker requires no credentials.
A single connection making ~10 alternating NAWS packets per second fully occupies the
connection-handling thread and produces continuous I/O on the server's output stream.
Because connection threads are re-used for the life of the session, one attacker per
available connection slot can deny service to all users of that slot.

Credits

This issue was identified by Michał Majchrowicz and Marcin Wyczechowski, members of the AFINE Team.

References

@gnodet gnodet published to jline/jline3 Jun 17, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jun 18, 2026
Reviewed Jun 18, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Jul 17, 2026
Last updated Jul 20, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(41st percentile)

Weaknesses

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-56741

GHSA ID

GHSA-2r2c-cx56-8933

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.