[!WARNING] This project is an experiment in unapologetic vibe coding. Code might be terrible, I don't even know 🤷♂️ But otherwise I wouldn't have built it in the first place. Now I have something that actually helps me.
A git-aware CLI that drives a turn-taking loop between a human and an autonomous coding agent: capture an idea, grill it into a product-level plan, grill that into a technical architecture, decompose it into work packages, execute with parallel subagents, test, agentically review each package, walk a human through a review, distill durable lessons from the cycle into the project's own docs, and finally squash the whole cycle into one conventional-commits commit at the end.
Internally, gtd is a pure fold over git history. The decision core
(src/Machine.ts) is a single IO-free function, resolve(events) — no
xstate, no actor, no Effect. The Effect "edge" (src/Events.ts) does all the
git/filesystem IO: it reads the first-parent commit subjects since the
merge-base with the default branch (whole-history fallback when there is no
default branch, when HEAD equals the merge-base, or when there is no merge-base)
plus the working tree, turns them into a COMMIT[] + single terminal RESOLVE
event stream, and folds them through the machine. The fold lands on exactly
one of 21 states, plus which actor (human or agent) is awaited there. A
single call resolves to a single state.
Steering is entirely machine-authored commit subjects — there are no marker
files, sentinels, or auto-advance tails to parse. A turn commit looks like
gtd(human): grilling or gtd(agent): building; a routing commit (bookkeeping
the machine performs itself between turns) looks like gtd: tests green.
src/Subjects.ts is the closed grammar both the machine and the edge read.
All workflow state lives under .gtd/: the product plan (.gtd/TODO.md),
the technical architecture it converges into (.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md), work
packages (.gtd/01-…/), review records (.gtd/REVIEW.md, .gtd/FEEDBACK.md),
and loop bookkeeping (.gtd/ERRORS.md, .gtd/HEALTH.md, .gtd/LEARNINGS.md,
.gtd/SQUASH_MSG.md). One rule follows for every agent in the loop: never
touch .gtd/ except the single file a prompt explicitly grants. A TODO.md
or REVIEW.md at the repository root is the project's own file — gtd never
reads, consumes, or deletes it. (Corollary: don't gitignore .gtd/ — the
workflow commits its state through it.)
gtd splits what used to be one mutating command into three:
gtd step— advance the workflow as the human actor, to fixpoint.gtd step-agent— advance the workflow as the agent actor, to fixpoint.gtd next— print the prompt for whichever actor is currently awaited, without mutating anything.
An agent loop is a two-beat protocol repeated forever:
- Run
gtd step-agentto advance any agent-owned bookkeeping to a fixpoint. - Run
gtd next --jsonand read theactorfield. If it is"human", halt — the human owns the next move, and the agent's job is done for this turn. If it is"agent", feedprompt(when non-null) to the agent, let it act, then go back to step 1; at a pending checkpoint (promptis null) go straight back to step 1.
A human acts by editing files (answering questions in .gtd/TODO.md or
.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md, annotating .gtd/REVIEW.md, fixing code) and then
running gtd step to capture the edit as their turn and hand control back to
the agent side of the loop.
gtd step-agent # advance the machine's own bookkeeping
gtd next --json # ask who's up and what they should doSee The reference loop driver for a full script
implementing this protocol, and skills/loop/SKILL.md
for the agent-facing instructions that follow the same pinned contract.
gtd-loop, installed alongside gtd (see below), is the packaged, ready-to-run
implementation of that same script for anyone who doesn't want to drive the loop
by hand.
npm install -g @pmelab/gtdOr run without installing:
npx @pmelab/gtdNo config file, no setup subcommand — gtd auto-initializes a .gtdrc.json
schema stub on first run (see Auto-init).
Usage: gtd [command] [options]
Commands:
step Advance the workflow as the human actor (to fixpoint)
step-agent Advance the workflow as the agent actor (to fixpoint)
next Print the prompt for whichever actor is awaited (no mutation)
status Predict the next commit and state from the working tree (no mutation)
review <target> Anchor an ad-hoc human review against a git ref or branch
format <file> Format a markdown file in place
Options:
--json Output structured JSON instead of plain text
--version, -v Print version and exit
--help, -h Print this help and exit
--version (-v) and --help (-h) short-circuit before any git or
repository-state work — they run outside a repo and in any repo state. Bare
gtd (no subcommand) is a usage error: it prints the help text and exits 1
without touching the repository. Every other command must be run from the
repository root — gtd derives steering files, diffs, and pathspecs relative
to cwd, so it refuses with a clear error if invoked from a subdirectory.
--json is the only long option. Any other -- option (including a typo like
--jsn) is rejected with a usage error rather than silently ignored, so a
mistyped flag can never degrade a JSON caller to plain-text mode.
One nuance to "(no mutation)": next and status never author commits or
change workflow state, but while a human review is pending they do maintain the
review checkout window (closing it to read state, re-arming it on the way out —
see Human review gate), which transiently moves HEAD and
the index. The working tree is never touched.
Both drive the same fixpoint loop — gather → resolve → perform the returned edge action → repeat — differing only in which actor's turn they are allowed to capture:
gtd stepcaptures the human turn at whichever gate is awaiting one.gtd step-agentcaptures the agent turn.
Fixpoint advance. A single invocation may author several commits: it authors
the awaited actor's turn commit, then keeps performing any further mid-chain
routing (a test run, a routing commit, a package close, …) until it reaches a
rest where a prompt would be shown, or a fixpoint where nothing changed.
gtd step/gtd step-agent never print a prompt themselves — that's
gtd next's job.
Idempotence. Re-running the same command again once the tree is settled at a rest authors zero new commits. It exits 0 while the rest still awaits that command's actor (an inert empty agent turn, the idle health check); once the rest awaits the other actor, the re-run is an out-of-turn refusal — still zero commits, but non-zero exit.
Out-of-turn refusal. Human and agent turns are strictly separated: the wrong
mutator always errors, at every state, on clean and dirty trees alike.
gtd step-agent while a human turn is awaited refuses with
"<state> awaits a human turn — run \gtd step`"; gtd
stepwhile an agent turn is awaited refuses with" awaits an agent turn —
run `gtd
step-agent`"— exit non-zero, zero commits either way. Human edits made while the agent is awaited (e.g. amendment notes in.gtd/package files after thegtd:
planning` commit lands) stay pending in the working tree and ride along as input
to the agent's next captured turn; left unamended, the build proceeds.
Red-test fixpoints exit 0. A red test run below the fix-attempt cap (or the
health-fix cap) still writes its findings and commits — it is a normal,
successful step of the loop, not a failure of the step/step-agent
invocation. step/step-agent only exit non-zero for a genuine refusal or an
operational error (bad config, missing test binary, corrupted state).
Output. Plain mode prints one committed: <subject> line per commit this
invocation authored (oldest→newest), then a final state: <state> line:
committed: gtd(human): grilling
committed: gtd: architecting
state: architecting
--json emits {state, actions, commits} instead (see
JSON schemas).
Pure prompt emitter — it never mutates the repository. It reports whichever actor is currently awaited and, if the tree is at a genuine rest, the full prompt for that actor.
Purity. No commits, no file writes, no test runs — gtd next only gathers
and resolves.
Dirty-tree refusal. If the working tree has pending changes outside the
steering-file set, gtd next refuses rather than guess at a prompt for a state
that hasn't been captured yet:
gtd next: working tree is dirty — run `gtd status` to inspect it, then advance with `gtd step` or `gtd step-agent` (whichever actor is awaited)
Pending. If HEAD is mid-chain — bookkeeping the next step/step-agent
invocation would perform before reaching a rest — gtd next reports
pending: true with no prompt. Mid-chain bookkeeping is invoker-agnostic, so
either mutator resumes it; the report names the actor whose chain it is. In
plain mode an agent-driven checkpoint prints "mid-chain checkpoint — run \gtd
step-agent` to continue, then run `gtd next`
again", a human-driven one prints "mid-chain checkpoint — run `gtd step` to
continue"`.
Agent tail lines. In plain-mode output, a prompt for the agent actor ends with the pinned tail:
Finish your turn by running `gtd step-agent`. Then run `gtd next` and follow
its output — repeat this cycle as long as the output is addressed to you (the
agent); when it awaits the human, stop and hand off.
The first sentence closes the current turn; the second closes the outer loop —
it is what lets a plain-text agent chain multiple iterations (e.g. successive
test/fix cycles) without an external driver, until a human gate is reached.
Human-actor prompts carry no tail. --json output never embeds the tail into
prompt either — the structured actor field (see JSON schemas below) carries
the same information: "agent" means another agent round, "human" means stop
and hand off.
Pure, read-only dry-run prediction — the same gather+resolve gtd next
runs, but reporting a prediction of the next turn rather than the actual prompt.
Performs no git mutation, no test run, no file write — guaranteed side-effect
free, including on a dirty tree.
Prints four fields:
State: grilling
Awaits: human
Predicted commit: gtd(human): grilling
Predicted state: grilling
- State — the currently resolved state.
- Awaits — the actor (
humanoragent) whose turn it is. - Predicted commit — the subject
step/step-agentwould author next, or(none)at a fixpoint (e.g. idle with nothing to do). - Predicted state — the state that commit would land in.
gtd status takes no arguments — extra positional args are rejected.
A pure mutator that anchors, then exits — it never prints a prompt itself. Use it to start an ad-hoc human review against an explicit git ref or branch, independent of the automatic review base the workflow otherwise computes.
- Refuses on a dirty tree.
- Resolves
<target>via merge-base semantics and computes the diff HEAD adds overmerge-base(<target>, HEAD). - Refuses if that diff is empty after filtering ("nothing to review").
- Authors exactly one commit:
gtd: reviewing <full-hash-of-the-base>. - Prints a short confirmation pointing at
gtd next— it does not print the review prompt itself.
gtd review main
# anchored review at <hash> — run `gtd next` to get the review prompt
gtd next --json
# {"actor":"agent", ...} — the review-record prompt scoped to that anchorErrors (all exit 1, message on stderr):
- Missing target:
gtd review: missing target argument - Extra arguments:
gtd review: too many arguments — expected one target, got: … - Unresolvable ref:
gtd review: cannot resolve ref '<target>': <error message> - Empty diff:
gtd review: nothing to review (<target> diff is empty after filtering)
Unchanged from v1: formats a markdown file in place with a bundled prettier
(parser: "markdown", printWidth: 80, proseWrap: "always"), ignoring the
host repo's own .prettierrc so .gtd/TODO.md/.gtd/REVIEW.md stay
consistently formatted regardless of the host project's toolchain. Rejects
--json (exit 1, gtd format does not accept --json) — it is a plain file
operation, not a v2 state command.
Errors (all exit 1, message on stderr):
- Missing path:
gtd format: missing file path argument - Extra arguments:
gtd format: too many arguments — expected one path, got: … - Non-markdown file:
gtd format: <file> is not a markdown file (expected .md or .markdown) - File not found:
gtd: skipped formatting <file>: not found
Pass --json to step, step-agent, next, or status for machine-readable
single-line JSON output instead of plain text.
step / step-agent — {state, actions, commits}:
{
"state": "architecting",
"actions": ["capture the human turn as \"gtd(human): grilling\""],
"commits": ["gtd(human): grilling", "gtd: architecting"]
}state— the final resolved state after the fixpoint loop settled.actions— human-readable descriptions of every edge action this invocation performed, oldest→newest.commits— every commit subject this invocation authored, oldest→newest.
next — {state, actor, pending, prompt}:
{
"state": "building",
"actor": "agent",
"pending": false,
"prompt": "..."
}state— the resolved state.actor—"human"or"agent": who owns the next move. This is the single loop-driver signal:"agent"means proceed with another round — act onpromptwhen present, then rungtd step-agent; at an agent-driven pending checkpoint (promptisnull, nothing to act on) just rungtd step-agent."human"means halt and hand off (a human rest, whose prompt body already tells the human what to do, or a human-driven pending checkpoint resumed bygtd step).pending—trueat a mid-chain HEAD (no prompt yet — resume with a mutator first);falseat a genuine rest.prompt— the full prompt markdown whenpendingisfalse, elsenull.
status — {state, actor, predictedCommit, predictedState}:
{
"state": "grilling",
"actor": "human",
"predictedCommit": "gtd(human): grilling",
"predictedState": "grilling"
}predictedCommit is null when the next invocation would author nothing (e.g.
idle with a green health check).
Error envelope — every command, in --json mode, reports failures inside
the JSON object rather than as unstructured text, and still exits 1:
{ "state": "error", "prompt": "<message>" }There is no auto-advance flag anywhere in the wire format — actor replaces it.
The caller decides whether to keep looping based on actor (halt on "human")
and pending (re-run step/step-agent first when true), not on a boolean
auto-advance flag.
A minimal bash implementation of the pinned two-beat protocol, driving an agent
CLI (e.g. claude -p) against gtd --json output. This is the authoritative
reference for what a loop driver must do; keep any other implementation
(including skills/loop/SKILL.md) consistent with it rather than editing both
independently.
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
while true; do
# 1. Advance the machine's own agent-owned bookkeeping to a fixpoint.
gtd step-agent --json >/dev/null || true
# 2. Ask who's up next. `actor` is the single "proceed" signal.
next="$(gtd next --json)"
actor="$(jq -r .actor <<<"$next")"
prompt="$(jq -r .prompt <<<"$next")"
if [[ "$actor" != "agent" ]]; then
echo "Halting — the human owns the next move."
break
fi
if [[ "$prompt" == "null" ]]; then
# Agent-driven pending checkpoint: nothing to act on — loop back to
# step 1, whose `gtd step-agent` resumes the mid-chain bookkeeping.
continue
fi
# Agent's turn: feed the prompt to the agent, then let it finish with
# `gtd step-agent` itself (the prompt's tail instructs it to).
claude -p "$prompt" --dangerously-skip-permissions
doneThe agent is expected to run gtd step-agent itself once it finishes acting on
the prompt (the plain-mode tail says exactly this) — the driver's own
step-agent calls exist to advance any bookkeeping the agent doesn't own
(routing commits, test runs) between agent turns.
The loop halts on actor: "human" alone: a human rest (pending: false, the
prompt body addresses the human) or a human-driven pending checkpoint
(pending: true, resumed by the human's own gtd step). Everything the agent
side can drive — agent rests and agent-driven checkpoints — reports
actor: "agent", so multiple agent turns and commits (e.g. successive test/fix
cycles, a force-approved package close) chain without human involvement until an
actual human gate is hit.
bin/gtd-loop, installed as the gtd-loop binary, is the packaged
implementation of this exact script — kept in sync with it the same way
skills/loop/SKILL.md is. It additionally attempts gtd step (not just
gtd step-agent) every iteration, so a plain rerun after you've edited a file
at a human gate (no commit needed) picks up your edit and keeps going, and it
halts with a diagnostic if the same state and prompt repeat with no progress
(see skills/loop/SKILL.md's "Stall detection").
gtd-loop defaults to
claude -p "$GTD_LOOP_PROMPT" --dangerously-skip-permissions, but the agent
invocation is swappable: set GTD_LOOP_AGENT_CMD to any shell command, and it
runs with the prompt available as $GTD_LOOP_PROMPT in its environment. For
example, to drive a different agent CLI:
GTD_LOOP_AGENT_CMD='my-agent-cli --prompt "$GTD_LOOP_PROMPT"' gtd-loopresolve() lands on exactly one of 21 states: grilling, architecting,
grilled, planning, building, testing, fixing, escalate,
agentic-review, close-package, review, await-review, done, learning,
await-learning-review, learning-apply, learning-applied, squashing,
idle, health-check, health-fixing. Each state has a fixed awaited actor
(see awaitedActor in src/Machine.ts): idle, escalate, await-review,
and await-learning-review await the human; every other state awaits the
agent.
For the full precedence ladder, illegal combinations, and the counter folds that drive the fix loops, see STATES.md — this section is a summary.
Authored by gtd step/gtd step-agent as the first commit of a fresh chain.
The closed set of gates:
| Gate | Authored by |
|---|---|
grilling |
human (answers) / agent (product-plan iteration) |
architecting |
human (answers) / agent (architecture iteration) |
grilled |
agent (converged, ready to decompose) |
building |
agent (package work, or human feedback while agent is out of turn) |
fixing |
agent (test-fix or review-fix round) |
agentic-review |
agent (writes .gtd/FEEDBACK.md verdict) |
review |
agent (writes .gtd/REVIEW.md) / human (approves or gives feedback) |
squashing |
agent (overwrites .gtd/SQUASH_MSG.md) |
learning |
agent (overwrites .gtd/LEARNINGS.md) / human (accepts or edits) |
learning-apply |
agent (integrates .gtd/LEARNINGS.md into CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/docs) |
health-fixing |
agent (idle health-check repair) |
escalate |
human (deletes .gtd/ERRORS.md to resume) |
Bookkeeping the machine authors itself between turns, never a turn a human or
agent "wins": gtd: architecting, gtd: grilled, gtd: planning,
gtd: tests green, gtd: errors, gtd: package done, gtd: awaiting review,
gtd: review feedback, gtd: done, gtd: squash template,
gtd: reviewing <hash> (parameterized, from gtd review), gtd: health-check,
gtd: health-fix, gtd: learning template, gtd: learning drafted,
gtd: learning approved, gtd: learning applied.
Everything else — any non-gtd subject, and any gtd: * subject outside this
closed set — is a boundary commit: inert as far as the machine's grammar is
concerned. See Upgrading from v1 for why
this matters on upgrade.
A dirty tree at a boundary HEAD (a fresh idea, sketched in a file or just left
as pending code) is captured in one human turn: gtd step commits
everything pending as gtd(human): grilling — nothing is reverted or seeded,
the captured files stay in history. gtd next hands the agent that turn's diff;
the agent develops .gtd/TODO.md into a concrete product-level plan in
one turn — user-facing decisions only, no architecture — proposing a
suggested default for every open question, and leaves .gtd/TODO.md
uncommitted for gtd(agent): grilling.
There are no markers to answer — the human either:
- Accepts the suggested defaults: runs a clean
gtd stepat the answer gate. An emptygtd(human): grillingturn plus routinggtd: architectinglands automatically —.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.mdis seeded from the converged.gtd/TODO.mdcontent and.gtd/TODO.mdis deleted, in that one commit. - Edits
.gtd/TODO.mdwith real answers, then runsgtd step, which captures the edit as a freshgtd(human): grillingturn and hands it back to the agent for another round.
Technical architecting works exactly the same way, one file later: the agent
develops .gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md into a concrete technical plan — file/module
structure, data model, tech-stack choices — and the human answers or accepts
defaults at the architecting gate. Accepting converges to gtd: grilled and
gtd next emits the decompose prompt (which now reads .gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md).
Escape hatch for already-technical input: if the human's initial dirty tree
already contains .gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md (their own technical sketch), gtd step
captures the entry turn as gtd(human): architecting directly, skipping product
grilling for that cycle entirely — no CLI flag needed, it's driven purely by
which steering file is present.
Once decomposed, .gtd/ holds ordered work packages. gtd next at
gtd: planning/gtd: package done selects the lowest-numbered remaining
package and inlines only its task files. The agent builds it and leaves the work
uncommitted; the next invocation's edge action commits it (the
gtd(agent): building turn commit) and runs testCommand.
- Green → Agentic Review.
- Red, below
fixAttemptCap(default 3) → write findings, commitgtd: errors, rest at Fixing for the agent. - Red, at/over the cap → write
.gtd/ERRORS.mdinstead, commitgtd: errors, rest at Escalate — a human gate. Deleting.gtd/ERRORS.mdand landing that deletion asgtd(human): escalateresets the budget and re-tests from zero in the same invocation.
A green test run always rests at Agentic Review: the agent reviews the
package's accumulated diff against its task specs and writes .gtd/FEEDBACK.md.
An empty .gtd/FEEDBACK.md is the approval signal — the same
gtd(agent): agentic-review turn closes the package (gtd: package done,
removing .gtd/FEEDBACK.md and the finished package directory) in one
invocation. Non-empty findings rest for the fixing prompt; fixing loops back
through the test gate and re-reviews. Once reviewFixCount >= reviewThreshold
(default 3) within a package, Agentic Review force-approves without ever
writing .gtd/FEEDBACK.md — so a package can never review-loop forever. The
findings round that crosses the threshold still gets its fixing round; the
force-approve close then fires at the next green re-test instead of another
review. (Any agentic-review turn that touches .gtd/FEEDBACK.md counts toward
the threshold — including the approval write itself; an approval that crosses
the threshold simply closes the package as usual.) Setting
agenticReview: false force-approves every package immediately.
A do-nothing agent invocation — gtd step-agent on a clean tree at ANY
agent-awaited rest whose move is a file artifact (grilling, architecting,
grilled, building, fixing, agentic-review, review, squashing while
.gtd/SQUASH_MSG.md still holds the unmodified template, learning while
.gtd/LEARNINGS.md still holds the unmodified template, and learning-apply
unconditionally) — is inert: zero commits, no state consumed; gtd next
re-emits the same prompt. This is load-bearing for the loop protocol, whose
every iteration opens with gtd step-agent before the agent has acted: without
the guard that opening beat would author junk empty turns — and worse, consume
workflow state (an empty decompose turn would delete .gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md with
no packages written; an empty squashing turn would squash the cycle under the
placeholder template). The same guards hold at the classification layer for
histories that already carry such turns: a gtd(agent): grilled HEAD only
routes to gtd: planning when packages exist, a gtd(agent): review HEAD only
routes to gtd: awaiting review when .gtd/REVIEW.md exists, and a squashing
(or learning) turn only proceeds once its template has been overwritten. The one
deliberate exception is health-fixing, whose empty turn is meaningful (the
failure may have been environmental — the machine removes .gtd/HEALTH.md and
re-tests). Human gates are unaffected: an empty human turn stays a signal
(accept-defaults at grilling/architecting, clean approval at review,
accept-the-draft-as-is at the learning review gate).
Once .gtd/ is fully closed, the machine writes .gtd/REVIEW.md and rests at
await-review, awaiting the human. Approval is any of:
- A clean
gtd step(nothing edited) — an emptygtd(human): reviewturn plus routinggtd: done. - Flipping only
- [ ]→- [x]checkboxes in.gtd/REVIEW.md— checkbox-only edits are also treated as clean approval. - Deleting
.gtd/REVIEW.mdoutright.
Any substantive edit — to .gtd/REVIEW.md prose, or to the reviewed code
itself — is feedback: gtd(human): review plus routing gtd: review feedback,
.gtd/REVIEW.md removed, and gtd next re-emits a grilling prompt to the agent
that inlines the human's finding.
The review diff lives in your editor. While the gate is pending, gtd holds
open a review checkout window: it saves the real head to
refs/gtd/review-head, then rewinds HEAD and the index to the review base with
git reset --mixed, leaving the working tree untouched. Every editor's standard
git integration now shows the entire reviewable diff as ordinary uncommitted
changes — SCM panel, gutter marks, per-file diffs. Review it there:
- Edit anything (code or
.gtd/REVIEW.mdprose) → feedback. - Discard a hunk in the editor → that reversion IS the feedback: the agent is re-grilled with it.
- Delete a surfaced file → reject-this-file feedback.
- Touch nothing (or tick checkboxes / delete
.gtd/REVIEW.md) → approval.
Any gtd invocation closes the window first (restoring HEAD/index exactly, so
only your own edits remain dirty — they land as their own separate
gtd(human): review commit, never mixed into the reviewed work), and
gtd next/gtd status re-arm it on their way out. The mechanics are
crash-safe; details and invariants in STATES.md ("The review checkout window").
Caveats while a review is pending: don't push (the branch tip rests at the
review base — the real head is safe under refs/gtd/review-head); commits you
make manually survive as working-tree content and become review feedback, but
their commit message is discarded; linked git worktree checkouts are
unsupported. If you switch branches mid-review, gtd refuses to touch the foreign
branch and prints the manual recovery command.
With learning: true (the default), gtd: done (or the health-fix path's green
re-test) is not a rest — the chain continues straight to
gtd: learning template, writing and committing a .gtd/LEARNINGS.md template,
running before the squash decision so it still sees the pre-squash history.
gtd next then emits the learning prompt: the agent walks the cycle's test
failures, review feedback, and health-check rounds, keeps only
durable/generalizable lessons, and overwrites .gtd/LEARNINGS.md with them.
Once gtd step-agent captures that draft (gtd(agent): learning), it rests at
await-learning-review for a human — who either accepts the draft as-is (an
empty turn) or edits it; there is no reject path, so the very next gtd step
always proceeds (gtd(human): learning → gtd: learning approved), resting at
learning-apply for the agent. The agent integrates the approved learnings
into the project's own docs (CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md/wherever fits, its
judgment); its turn (gtd(agent): learning-apply) removes .gtd/LEARNINGS.md
and lands at gtd: learning applied, which then runs the same squash decision
gtd: done runs today. With learning: false, gtd: done behaves exactly as
it does without this section: no .gtd/LEARNINGS.md is ever written. Learning
and squash are independent flags — either can be on without the other.
With squash: true (the default), gtd: done (or, once learning has run,
gtd: learning applied) is not a rest — the same chain continues straight
to gtd: squash template, writing and committing a .gtd/SQUASH_MSG.md
template. gtd next then emits the squashing prompt: the agent overwrites
.gtd/SQUASH_MSG.md with a real conventional-commits message (drawing on
grilling- and architecting-round decisions from history) and finishes its turn.
gtd step-agent then performs the squash itself: git reset --soft <base> +
git commit, collapsing every intermediate gtd: * commit of the cycle into
one — including any review-feedback detours, and the learning phase's own
commits if learning ran: the squash base is the cycle's ORIGINAL start (the
first grilling or, via the escape hatch, architecting turn since the previous
gtd: done boundary, or the gtd: reviewing <hash> anchor for an ad-hoc review
cycle), not the most recent re-grilling round — the collapse folds the whole
cycle into one, using the overwritten message's content verbatim (turn position,
not message content, triggers the squash). Doc edits made during
learning-apply survive in the squashed tree, not as their own commit. With
squash: false, gtd: done (or gtd: learning applied) is the resting
boundary and no template is ever written.
Outside any process (idle, nothing to review, no steering files), gtd step
runs testCommand as a health check rather than settling immediately. Green
settles idle with zero commits. Red below fixAttemptCap writes
.gtd/HEALTH.md and rests at Health Fixing for the agent; the fixer's own
turn (gtd(agent): health-fixing) removes .gtd/HEALTH.md and re-tests in the
same chain — a green re-test continues to learning (if enabled), then squash (if
enabled), or idle; red repeats the health-fix loop; red at the cap writes
.gtd/ERRORS.md and escalates.
.gtd/ERRORS.md present is always a human gate, regardless of which loop wrote
it (test-fix or health-fix). Deleting .gtd/ERRORS.md and running gtd step
records the deletion as the human's gtd(human): escalate turn, which
immediately re-tests in the same invocation — this resets the relevant
fix-attempt budget to zero.
| State | Awaits | Turn/routing subject at rest |
|---|---|---|
grilling |
human or agent | gtd(human): grilling / gtd(agent): grilling |
architecting |
human or agent | gtd: architecting / gtd(agent): architecting |
grilled |
agent | gtd: grilled |
planning |
agent | .gtd/ modified |
building |
agent | gtd: planning / gtd: package done |
testing |
— (edge-only) | mid-chain only |
fixing |
agent | gtd: errors |
escalate |
human | .gtd/ERRORS.md present |
agentic-review |
agent | gtd: tests green |
close-package |
— (edge-only) | mid-chain only |
review |
agent | gtd: package done (no more packages) / gtd: reviewing <hash> |
await-review |
human | gtd: awaiting review |
done |
— (edge-only) | gtd: done |
learning |
agent | gtd: learning template |
await-learning-review |
human | gtd: learning drafted |
learning-apply |
agent | gtd: learning approved |
learning-applied |
— (edge-only) | gtd: learning applied |
squashing |
agent | gtd: squash template |
idle |
human | no steering files, green health check |
health-check |
— (edge-only) | mid-chain only |
health-fixing |
agent | .gtd/HEALTH.md present |
See STATES.md for the full precedence ladder, the counter folds, and every illegal steering-file combination.
gtd reads an optional .gtdrc config file via
cosmiconfig. With no config, the
built-in defaults apply. Supported filenames (searched in this order):
.gtdrc.gtdrc.json.gtdrc.yaml.gtdrc.ymlgtd.config.jsongtd.config.yaml
testCommand(string, defaultnpm run test) — the command the edge runs after a build turn, and on the idle health-check path.fixAttemptCap(non-negative integer, default3) — the test-fix budget: how manygtd: errorsattempts are allowed per sub-loop before the failure is escalated to.gtd/ERRORS.md(Escalate).0disables the cap (escalates immediately on the first red run). Also reused as the health-fix budget — no separate config key.reviewThreshold(integer ≥ 1, default3) — the review-fix budget: how many agentic-review findings rounds are allowed per package before Agentic Review force-approves.agenticReview(boolean, defaulttrue) — kill-switch for the per-package Agentic Review gate. Setfalseto force-approve every package and proceed directly to human review.squash(boolean, defaulttrue) — aftergtd: done(or, once learning has run,gtd: learning applied), collapse the cycle'sgtd: *commits into a single conventional-commits commit. Setfalseto keep the granular history.learning(boolean, defaulttrue) — aftergtd: done(or the health-fix path's green re-test), distill durable lessons from the cycle into.gtd/LEARNINGS.md, have a human review them, then integrate them into the project's own docs before the squash decision runs. Setfalseto skip the phase entirely — independent ofsquash.models— model selection for the subagent-spawning states:planning— high-reasoning tier (defaultclaude-opus-4-8), used bydecompose(thegrilled/planningstates),grilling,architecting,agentic-review, andclean(thereview/squashing/learning/learning-applystates).execution— everyday tier (defaultclaude-sonnet-4-8), used bybuildingandfixing.states.*— per-state overrides keyed bydecompose,grilling,architecting,building,fixing,agentic-review,clean. Unknownstateskeys are rejected.
$schema(string, optional) — stripped before validation, so it never counts as an unknown key. Point it at the published schema for editor-backed autocompletion. Aschema.jsonis generated from the config schema at build time and ships with the package.
If a config file fails to load or is invalid, gtd exits with code 1 and writes a human-readable error to stderr (never stdout):
- Parse errors (malformed YAML/JSON) — message includes the offending filename.
- Non-object top-level — a YAML list or
nullat the root is rejected with the filename in the message. - Schema violations — unknown keys or out-of-range values emit
Invalid gtd config: <field>: <reason>. - Missing test binary — if
testCommandnames an executable that cannot be found (ENOENT), gtd exits 1 withgtd: test command not found: <command>on stderr. A non-zero test exit code is not an error — it drives the normal red path.
gtd walks from the current working directory up to your home directory (or
to the filesystem root when cwd is outside home), collecting every .gtdrc it
finds along the way. All found levels are deep-merged, with the innermost
(cwd) config winning on conflicts — so a shared .gtdrc in a worktree-parent
directory cascades to every checkout beneath it, while any individual checkout
can still override settings with its own .gtdrc.
On every state command (step, step-agent, next, status, review)
that has passed the repo-root guard, if the cwd→root walk finds no config
anywhere, gtd creates and commits a starter .gtdrc.json at the repository root
containing only a $schema link. Auto-init never runs for --version/--help,
format, bare/unknown commands, or an invocation refused by the repo-root guard
— those perform no repository mutation of any kind. On a repo with no commits
yet, or whose HEAD is a plain (non-gtd:) commit, the stub is committed as its
own chore: add .gtdrc.json. If HEAD is already a gtd:-owned commit
(mid-workflow), the stub is instead amended into HEAD — stacking a fresh
boundary commit there would produce an unrecognized HEAD most workflow states
can't resolve past.
# .gtdrc.yaml
testCommand: pnpm test
fixAttemptCap: 3
reviewThreshold: 3
agenticReview: true
squash: true
learning: true
models:
planning: claude-opus-4-8
execution: claude-sonnet-4-8
states:
decompose: claude-opus-4-8
building: claude-sonnet-4-8- Single writer, linear branch. State is folded from first-parent history only. A merge commit at HEAD is unsupported (documented, not handled) — it degrades gracefully on the default branch rather than crashing, but do not rely on merge commits mid-cycle.
- Test/build artifacts must be gitignored. This is load-bearing, not a
style preference: every fixpoint hop in
gtd step/gtd step-agentdetects "clean" viagit status --porcelain, which silently omits anything matched by.gitignore. If yourtestCommand(or the build it triggers) writes tracked-but-untracked output — adist/, a coverage report, a log file — into the working tree, the tree never goes clean after a green test run, and the fixpoint loop cannot converge: it will either loop forever re-detecting a "dirty" boundary or misclassify build output as the human's next feature capture. Gitignore every path your test/build toolchain writes before wiring gtd into a repo. - Repository root invocation. Every subcommand except
--help/--versionmust run from the git repository root — steering files and diffs are resolved against the process cwd.
The Grilled/Planning states spawn a planning-model subagent that breaks
.gtd/ARCHITECTURE.md into executable work packages under .gtd/:
.gtd/
01-auth-module/
01-define-types.md
02-implement-login.md
02-api-endpoints/
01-create-routes.md
02-add-middleware.md
Rules:
- Packages are sequential, in ordinal dependency order —
01-,02-, …; the set is frozen once written. Package 02 cannot start until 01 is complete. - Each package is green on its own — the test suite runs after every package, so none may leave the tree red for a later package to fix.
- Tasks within a package are parallel and file-disjoint — one subagent per task, no isolation; tasks that would touch the same file are merged into one.
- Vertical slices, not horizontal — each package is a thin, end-to-end slice; prefer many thin packages over a "set up infrastructure" package.
- Task files are self-contained — description, acceptance-criteria checkboxes, relevant file paths, constraints, and edge cases.
Execution is one package per cycle. gtd next selects the single next
package itself, names it in the prompt, and inlines its task files' full
contents — the agent never browses .gtd/ or picks a package itself. A single
cycle:
- Spawn parallel execution-model workers for all tasks in the selected package.
- Leave all changes uncommitted. Do not commit, do not delete the package directory, do not run tests.
- Finish the turn with
gtd step-agent— the next hop's edge action commits the work (gtd(agent): building) and runstestCommandto verify it.
v2 ships as a major semantic-release bump (2.0.0) so the binary and the
loop-driving text (this README, skills/loop/SKILL.md) can never skew against
each other. There is no backward compatibility with the v1 command surface:
the single mutating gtd command, marker/sentinel files, the autoAdvance JSON
field, and the gtd: transport handoff commit are all gone. gtd bare now
errors rather than driving a loop; use gtd step-agent / gtd next /
gtd step instead.
Commit-history compatibility is one-way. Any repo with v1-taxonomy history
in it (gtd: new task, gtd: grilling, gtd: transport, a bare
gtd: reviewing with no hash, …) upgrades cleanly: those subjects fall outside
v2's closed turn/routing grammar and parse as inert boundary commits — they
are never mistaken for v2 workflow state and never error.
Finish or clean up any in-flight v1 cycle first. If a repo has an
in-progress v1 cycle — steering files present (root-level TODO.md,
REVIEW.md, FEEDBACK.md, ERRORS.md, or .gtd/) whose HEAD carries v1-only
commit subjects — the v2 binary does not know how to resume it: v1 steering
files have no v2 turn commit backing them, so a cold v2 invocation on that tree
can land in an unrecognized state. Either finish the v1 cycle to a clean
boundary with your existing v1 binary before upgrading, or manually clean up
(remove the steering files / .gtd/, commit the result) so the upgrade starts
from a plain boundary HEAD.
Steering files moved into .gtd/. Earlier v2 builds kept TODO.md,
REVIEW.md, FEEDBACK.md, ERRORS.md, HEALTH.md, and SQUASH_MSG.md at the
repository root; they now live under .gtd/. Upgrade at a clean boundary (idle,
post-squash): a repo at rest needs nothing. Mid-cycle repos should either finish
the cycle on the old build first or move the root-level steering files into
.gtd/ by hand and commit. History classification is backward-compatible — the
counter folds recognize both the old root paths and the new .gtd/ paths in
existing commits.
Re-copy the loop skill. If you vendor skills/loop/ into a consuming repo
or agent harness, upgrading the gtd binary also means re-copying that skill
from this release — the v1 skill text still describes the old single-command
loop and will drive the new binary incorrectly.
For maintainers: this repo releases via semantic-release reading Conventional
Commits, and needs no config change for a major bump — but the release
commit/PR must carry a BREAKING CHANGE: footer (or a ! after the type)
for @semantic-release/commit-analyzer to compute 2.0.0 rather than a
minor/patch bump.
npm install
npm run dev # run from source, no build (node dev/run.mjs)
npm run build # tsup → dist/gtd.bundle.mjs
npm test # format:check, typecheck, lint, unit + e2e tests, fallow
npm run test:unit # vitest unit tests (the pure resolver) — --project unit
npm run test:e2e # gherkin e2e via vitest + quickpickle — --project e2e
npm run test:mutation # StrykerJS mutation testing (manual only, ~2 min)
npm run typecheck
npm run lintA pre-commit hook is installed automatically via the prepare script when you
run npm install on a fresh clone — no manual setup needed. The hook runs
lint-staged with
Prettier, formatting every staged file before each
commit (prettier --ignore-unknown --write), mirroring the format:check step
enforced in CI (prettier --check .).
Each prompt-bearing state has a self-contained Eta template in
src/prompts/*.md that owns its full prompt — header, context, and body. Shared
fragments live as partials in src/prompts/partials/: header, the context
renderers (diff, feedback, package), and the single agent-turn tail
partial (the pinned "Finish your turn by running gtd step-agent. Then run
gtd next …" loop-closing instructions).
At module load, src/Prompt.ts registers every template on a single new Eta()
instance via loadTemplate. readFile and resolvePath are nulled afterward
so rendering resolves exclusively from the in-memory cache — the compiled ESM
bundle carries no runtime fs dependency.
buildPrompt(result, resolveModel?, output?) selects the state's template,
builds a view-model (model string, tail partial name, context), renders it,
collapses runs of three or more blank lines to two, and ensures exactly one
trailing newline. It throws for the five states that render no prompt at all
(testing, planning, close-package, done, health-check) — those are
performed entirely by the edge.
npm run dev runs src/main.ts directly via Node's native TypeScript
type-stripping (requires Node 22.6+). It registers dev/hooks.mjs, which fills
the two gaps the tsup build otherwise covers: resolving ./Foo.js specifiers to
the on-disk ./Foo.ts, and importing *.md prompt files as text. Pass CLI args
after --, e.g. npm run dev -- format <file>.
The decision core (src/Machine.ts) is pure and IO-free, so the whole 16-state
ladder and both counter folds are trivially unit-testable in isolation; all
git/filesystem IO is confined to the edge (src/Events.ts).
npm run build produces dist/gtd.bundle.mjs, which npm exposes as the gtd
binary via the bin field in package.json.
Run mutation testing on-demand with npm run test:mutation (StrykerJS, ~2 min)
— never run it as part of routine development; it is a deliberate,
manually-triggered check. The single stryker.config.json mutates six core
files:
src/Machine.ts src/Prompt.ts src/Config.ts
src/Format.ts src/State.ts src/Events.ts
src/Git.ts is excluded: the Cucumber harness stubs git at the Effect boundary,
so Git.ts mutants have zero in-memory coverage.
The HTML report lands in reports/mutation/mutation.html (git-ignored).
Releases are automatic. Push releasable Conventional Commits (fix:, feat:,
or breaking changes) to main and the Release workflow runs the tests, then
npx semantic-release. Semantic-release computes the next version, writes it
into package.json, builds the bundle, commits the bump back as
chore(release): X.Y.Z [skip ci], tags vX.Y.Z, and creates the GitHub release
with gtd.bundle.mjs attached.
MIT