Skip to content

docs: add Browserless MCP browser automation example#21588

Open
andyMrtnzP wants to merge 5 commits into
run-llama:mainfrom
andyMrtnzP:docs/examples-tools-browserless
Open

docs: add Browserless MCP browser automation example#21588
andyMrtnzP wants to merge 5 commits into
run-llama:mainfrom
andyMrtnzP:docs/examples-tools-browserless

Conversation

@andyMrtnzP

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

Adds a browserless.ipynb example to docs/examples/tools/ covering Browserless — a hosted browser-automation MCP server. Browserless exposes 10 tools over a single streamable-HTTP endpoint (smart scraper, search, map, crawl, export, performance, function, download, plus a multi-turn browser agent), all auto-importable via llama-index-tools-mcp with no partner package required. Browser sessions are pinned by Mcp-Session-Id, so multi-turn ReAct loops preserve browser state across calls — the example demonstrates both stateless single-shot tools and the multi-turn browserless_agent.

New Package?

Did I fill in the tool.llamahub section in the pyproject.toml and provide a detailed README.md for my new integration or package?

  • [] Yes
  • No

Version Bump?

Did I bump the version in the pyproject.toml file of the package I am updating? (Except for the llama-index-core package)

  • Yes
  • No

Type of Change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Your pull-request will likely not be merged unless it is covered by some form of impactful unit testing.

  • I added new unit tests to cover this change
  • I believe this change is already covered by existing unit tests

Suggested Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added Google Colab support for the newly added notebooks.
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • I ran uv run make format; uv run make lint to appease the lint gods

@review-notebook-app

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@dosubot dosubot Bot added the size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 7, 2026
@andyMrtnzP

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Executed end-to-end against the live mcp.browserless.io endpoint with claude-sonnet-4-6. All 16 code cells produced real outputs. No unit test surface for an example notebook.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size:M This PR changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant